Issue: 2.05 | May 1, 2001 | by:
Marlene Adler Marks
|
||||
A Jewish Sopranos? In my house last Sunday evening, Tony Soprano easily defeated Anne Frank as
"must see TV." Yes, even in the home of committed Jews, the rancid affairs of a
New Jersey Mafia family beat out the young girl of the Holocaust. The question
is, why? All season long my friends and I, Jewish boomers, have followed and then
avidly discussed the gangster Sopranos, whose patriarch, Tony (James Gandolfini)
endures the slights of his own mother, suffers panic attacks and sees a
therapist, Jennifer Melfi (Lorraine Bracco) while conducting his nefarious
business at the Bada Bing Club. For a week or two, after the rape of Dr. Melfi
and the particularly hideous murder of a pregnant prostitute by one of Tony's
low-lifes, we swore off watching the HBO series, protesting its gratuitous
violence. But we came back, as did much of upscale America, in time to see
Meadow Soprano's gloomy affair with an African-American/Jewish student and Uncle
Junior's struggle with chemotherapy. It never occurred to me to forego last week's season finale, though I didn't
expect its competition to be an updated realistic portrait of the Jewish girl
with the diary in which Anne's father, Otto, is played by Ben Kingsley. Yet after watching the conclusion of Anne Frank on ABC Monday night, a story
which concludes with a heart-breaking descent into the concentration camp, I see
the truth behind my own instincts. In such small choices we discern the changing
nature of Jewish life and the meaning of our history in America today. First, I was struck by the superficial similarities between the Frank and
Soprano domestic situations. The Franks are hidden from the Nazis in an Amsterdam attic and soon are part
of a new extended family, rife with suspicion, hysteria and misunderstanding. So
too are the Sopranos in hiding, not only from the FBI and police but from
non-Mafia Americans who might mistake their ethics; in their extended clan
betrayal is the name of the game. Otto Frank and his wife, Edith, don't get along much better than Carmela and
Tony. Anne is every bit as attracted to her attic-mate Peter as Meadow Soprano
is to her cousin Junior. Otto is guilt-ridden over not getting his daughters to freedom. Tony,
likewise, is beset with how his own crime career implicates his wayward son, A.J.
Of course the Sopranos are fiction and guilty; The Frank family are real and
innocent. But those are not the telling differences. One was old-world drama
fearing Big Government; the other was new world drama, in which life's problems
come down to class and self. Of course we must continue to retell the story of Anne Frank, as each
generation learns the horror of the Holocaust and the death of innocents, with
the caveat Never Again. But if Anne Frank, great and sweeping and tragic as her story is, is the only
story about Jews that TV understands, then we'll all be victims of the remote.
It's not only out of respect to the Six Million that television continues to
rely on Holocaust dramas for Jewish life, it's a failure of nerve and the
imagination. We can ask if our community would tolerate stories in which the
Jewish religious world duels with the realities of government and/or business as
the Sopranos must. The dearth of Jewish characters on television today suggests
otherwise, that we have painted ourselves into a corner called
self-righteousness. Not so long ago, Isaac Bashevis Singer won a large audience by portraying the
dramatic conflicts of the religious life, including the passions that push
devout people to go over the line. His stories were populated by ghosts of
destroyed Eastern European Jewish worlds, but they were deeply rooted in the
Now. If we want to get to the contemporary moment, we have to be ready for the
bombshells. Jewish crime did not end with "Once Upon a Time in America." The
newspapers tell us that we are not removed from the human dilemma: A rabbi is
charged with a murder for hire, another is accused of sexual abuse. A religious
husband traps his wife in a loveless marriage. Certainly we understand that
commitment to a religious life does not end one's fight with temptation, but in
a way only begins the battle. In our fictions we can know ourselves, and attest
to the strengths of our beliefs. I'd love to see a weekly script dealing with the conflicts between an
observant family and contemporary life. How do we read the stories of Abraham,
Isaac and Jacob and then handle labor negotiations? How does a patriarch,
knowledgeable about the laws of Leviticus, control sexual jealousy? Last week,
in the portion Behar, there is a warning about dealings in real estate, with the
warning repeated, "Do not wrong one another, but fear your God." There's a plot
device right there. Are we ready for a "Jewish Sopranos?" |
||||||
|
||||||
© 2001 Marlene Adler Marks. You can contact Marlene directly at wmnsvoice@aol.com |
||||||
|
||||||