Issue: 4.05 May 1, 2003
by: Harvey Rogers

Analysis


Much of the world refers to the Israeli presence in the contested areas adjoining Israel as an "occupation" when in fact it is an attempt on behalf of Israel to protect it’s citizens from the long standing aim of Musrabs, (A contraction I coined for Muslim Arabs) to prevent a Jewish State on what they choose to consider "Holy Muslim Land."

Any objective reading of history, ("The Siege" by Connor Cruise O"Brien is a good example) shows that armed Musrabs have been attacking and killing (while screaming "Ichdad Yahood," meaning "kill the Jews) unarmed Jews in what was then called Palestine since the mid 1800's.

Even though there was no Jewish State until 1948 and no Jewish presence in what is now called the West Bank and Gaza until 1967 these attacks continued sporadically. This makes clear that the current killing is not due to an "occupation."

As long as the armed Musrabs could kill unarmed Jews there was no international outcry. After all, armed people had been killing unarmed and stateless Jews since the Roman conquest. This came to be expected as the way of the world. Unfortunately, many Jews came to accept it.

From the time of the Roman conquest, the statelessness of the Jewish people has been used as another excuse to hate them and attack them.

In the 1930's there were signs in Europe saying, "Jews go to Palestine" (Now there are signs saying, "Jews get out of Palestine.")

Since the time came that Jews could fight back, there has been an unending stream of criticism of them for doing so. Much of the world was upset by the fact that Jews at long last could take up arms and effectively defend themselves. Unfortunately some Jews were also upset by the fact that Jews could now fight back and were in fact doing so.

When, following Musrab opposition and numerous double crosses by western countries the speck of land which is almost 0% of the earth’s surface, and was less than 25% of the area of the British Mandate in 1917 when the Balfour declaration approving a Jewish homeland in the Mandate was issued, Israel was approved by the UN as the Jewish homeland.

Immediately, five Musrab nations tried to destroy Israel. When the Jews weren’t destroyed and in fact started winning, there was a cease fire called. Those cease fire lines established the "pre 1967" borders of Israel. (Those are the borders that some Musrabs’s now say they want.) The Musrabs’s were not satisfied with the pre 1967 borders then, and most indicate that other than as a way station on the road to the destruction of Israel, they won’t be satisfied with them now.

In 1967 the Musrabs again tried to destroy Israel. When once again the Jews were winning, another cease fire was called. The new cease fire lines established what are basically the additional areas the Musrabs now want for a "Palestinian" State.

As could be predicted, in 1973 Egypt, Syria and Jordan in a sneak attack, commenced, another war seeking to destroy Israel. Once again, when Israel was winning, a cease fire was called.

Anwar Sadat, in a move that should win him the title as the greatest con man of all time, with the aid of grinning Jimmy Carter, in return for nothing tangible, got back the land that Israel won in 1973 when they not only avoided destruction but counterattacked.

Israel tried to govern all the land won at a high cost to Israel, as little as possible. (Again see The Siege.)The hope was that the Musrabs would run their own civil affairs. During this period the Israeli’s bragged about how they helped the Musrabs, cut infant mortality, generally improved health care, provided schools and Universities, and improved the economy, and provided other benefits,.although the Musrabs did not receive exactly the same level of governmental aid as the Jewish populace.

As Meir Kahane observed in his book "They Must Go," the improvements in the Musrab’s life only served to develop a healthier, stronger and better educated enemy. An irrational hatred will only be intensified by trying to be helpful to those who seek to destroy you.

There are thousands of quotes from Musrabs leaders and spokesmen making clear that their aim is to destroy Israel and to kill Jews anywhere they can. Polls show that over 50% of the Musrabs share this aim. Is there any reason they should not be taken at their word?

A large portion of the world, for their own reasons, refuses to deal with this stated and acted upon desire to destroy Israel .

As much as many people would like "Peace Now," it is unattainable for Israel. No matter what Israel does their enemies will keep trying to destroy it.

If the Musrabs would stop murdering innocent Jews, an unacceptable option to them, Israel would like to withdraw their military forces from the contested areas, have the Musrabs run their own civil affairs as much as possible, work at their jobs in Israel, build their economy, and improve their lives in all respects.

Unfortunately they’ll never do this. Their leaders will never give up their positions which among other things, allows them to use the financial support meant for the general populace for their own purposes, to have exalted positions and to chase their fantasies.

Their current plan is to keep killing Jews and at the same time to try to turn the world against Israel for taking military action when they attempt to stop the killing of their citizens and then ultimately destroy Israel .

The three main principals of the Musrab spokesmen and their sympathizers is lie, lie lie.

Since, for centuries, some people have believed the most ridiculous, grotesque and contradictory lies about Jews, they feel they can succeed.

They reason, that if people can believe that a Jew living today can be guilty of killing Jesus, that Jews use Christian babies blood for ritual purposes, are engaged in a worldwide conspiracy, are descendants of dogs, monkeys and pigs, are the children of Satan, that the world leaders including the Pope take orders from "the Jews " that "The Jews "are at the same time Communists, Capitalists and International Bankers and so on, people will believe any lies they can dream up. They see those lies have often worked in the past.

Many Anti-Semites, as one of their lies, equate Jews and Nazis. If that comparison had even the remotest possibility of being true, the Israeli’s could opt for a "Final Solution" to the Musrab problem.

The actual solution to the complaints of the Musrabs is for them to stop the wanton killing of innocent people, to give up their ambition of destroying Israel and to stop teaching hatred of Jews.

Unfortunately, they won’t adopt this course of conduct. If they could, they would stop Israeli military retaliation and could start building a better life and a functioning economy.

Reasonable and informed people should understand how unfairly Jews are being blamed and that sympathy for the Musrabs is misplaced.


 
Harvey Rogers is a lawyer and author. He can be contacted at harvesaurus@netzero.net
Printer friendly version of this article
Bigger font
BACK TO THE TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
Advertisement