Issue: 4.06 | June 4, 2003 | by:
Charles Patterson
|
||||
The Great Divide In the course of his development towards culture man acquired a dominating
position over his fellow-creatures in the animal kingdom. Not content with this
supremacy, however, he began to place a gulf between his nature and theirs. He
denied the possession of reason to them, and to himself he attributed an
immortal soul, and made claims to a divine descent which permitted him to
annihilate the bond of community between him and the animal kingdom. Where does all the war, racism, genocide, terrorism, violence, and cruelty so
endemic to human civilization come from? Why do humans exploit and massacre each
other so regularly? Why is our species so violence-prone? Could it be that we
oppress and kill each other so readily because our abuse and slaughter of
animals has desensitized us to the suffering and death of others? The "domestication" of animals—the exploitation of goats, sheep, cattle, and
other animals for their meat, milk, hides, and labor that began in the Near East
about eleven thousand years ago—changed human history. In earlier
hunter-gatherer societies there had been some sense of kinship between humans
and animals, reflected in totemism and myths which portrayed animals, or
part-animal/part-human creatures, as creators and progenitors of the human race.
However, mankind crossed the Rubicon when Near Eastern herdsmen and farmers
started castrating, hobbling, and branding captive animals to control their
mobility, diet, growth, and reproductive lives. In the first civilizations that
emerged in the river valleys of ancient Egypt, Mesopotamia, India, and China,
the exploitation of animals for food, milk, hides, and labor was so firmly
established that these civilizations sanctified the notion that animals existed
solely for their benefit. This allowed humans to use, abuse, and kill them with
total impunity. This domination, control, and manipulation of animals served as the model for
the enslavement/domestication of people. It led humans to place other
humans—captives, enemies, strangers, and those who were different or disliked—on
the other side of the great divide where they were vilified as "beasts," "pigs,"
"dogs," and "rats." Calling people animals has always been an ominous sign
because it sets them up for humiliation, exploitation, and murder. As Leo Kuper
writes in Genocide: Its Political Use in the Twentieth Century, "The animal
world has been a particularly fertile source of metaphors of dehumanization." From Slaughterhouse to Death Camp In his autobiography, My Life and Work (1922), Henry Ford revealed that his
inspiration for assembly-line production came from a visit he made as a young
man to a Chicago slaughterhouse. "I believe that this was the first moving line
ever installed. The idea [of the assembly line] came in a general way from the
overhead trolley that the Chicago packers use in dressing beef." A Swift and
Company publication from that time described the division-of-labor principle
that so impressed Ford: "The slaughtered animals, suspended head downward from a
moving chain, or conveyor, pass from workman to workman, each of whom performs
some particular step in the process." In the early 1920s Ford's weekly newspaper, the Dearborn Independent, published
a series of articles based on the text of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion,
an anti-Semitic tract that had been circulating in Europe. Ford published a
book-length compilation of the articles entitled The International Jew, which
was translated into most European languages and widely disseminated by
anti-Semites, chief among them the German publisher Theodor Fritsch, an early
supporter of Hitler. Thanks to a well-financed publicity campaign and the
prestige of the Ford name, The International Jew was hugely successful both
domestically and internationally. The selective breeding of animals and plants prompted delegates to ask why such
techniques could not be applied to human beings. The International Jew, or The Eternal Jew as it became known in Germany, quickly
became the country's number one bestseller in the 1920s. After it came to the
attention of Hitler in Munich, he used a shortened version of it in the Nazi
propaganda war against the Jews. Baldur von Schirach, the leader of the Hitler
Youth movement, said at the postwar Nuremberg war crimes trial that he became a
convinced anti-Semite at age seventeen after reading The Eternal Jew. "You have
no idea what a great influence this book had on the thinking of German youth.
The younger generation looked with envy to symbols of success and prosperity
like Henry Ford, and if he said the Jews were to blame, why naturally we
believed him." Ford, who based his automobile assembly line on the model of the American
slaughterhouse, exported to Germany both his anti-Semitism that helped make the
Holocaust happen and the method the Germans used to kill Jews. Although Ford
stopped publishing the Dearborn Independent in late 1927 and agreed to withdraw
The International Jew from the book market, copies of it continued to circulate
in large numbers throughout Europe and Latin America into the late 1930s. On January 7, 1942—exactly one month after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor
that brought the United States into the war—Ford wrote a letter to Sigmund
Livingston, national chairman of the Anti-Defamation League, expressing his
disapproval of hatred "against the Jew or any other racial or religious group."
But by that time, Einsatzgruppen (German mobile killing squads) in the East had
already murdered hundreds of thousands of Jewish men, women, and children, and
the first German extermination camp at Kulmhof (Chelmno) was already
operational. The desire to improve the hereditary qualities of the human population had its
beginnings in the 1860s when Francis Galton, an English scientist and cousin of
Charles Darwin, turned from meteorology to the study of heredity (he coined the
term "Eugenics" in 1881). By the end of the nineteenth century, genetic
theories, founded on the assumption that heredity was based on rigid genetic
patterns little influenced by social environment, dominated scientific thought. The Eugenics movement in America began with the creation of the American
Breeders' Association (ABA) in 1903. At the second meeting of the ABA in 1905, a
series of reports about the great success achieved in the selective breeding of
animals and plants prompted delegates to ask why such techniques could not be
applied to human beings. The creation of a Committee on Human Heredity
(Eugenics) at the third ABA meeting in 1906 launched the American Eugenics
movement. Its leader was poultry researcher Charles B. Davenport, who served as the
director of the Eugenics Record Office and described Eugenics as "the science of
the improvement of the human race by better breeding." He looked forward to the
time when a woman would no more accept a man "without knowing his
biological-genealogical history" than a stockbreeder would take "a sire for his
colts or calves who was without pedigree." Sterilization began in America in 1887, when the superintendent of the
Cincinnati Sanitarium published the first public recommendation for the
sterilization of criminals, both as a punishment and a way to prevent further
crime. Authorities used the same method to sterilize male criminals that farmers
used on their male animals not selected for breeding—castration. Castration was
the preferred method used to sterilize male criminal offenders until 1899, when
vasectomy was adopted because it was more practical. By 1930 more than half of the American states passed laws that authorized the
sterilization of criminals and mentally ill people. By then compulsory
sterilization had widespread support in the United States, with college
presidents, clergymen, mental health workers, and school principals among its
strongest supporters. The United States quickly became the model for other
countries that wanted to sterilize their "defectives." Denmark was the first
European country to pass such a law in 1929, followed in rapid succession by
other European nations. In Germany Eugenics established deep roots in medical and scientific circles
after World War I. In 1920 two respected academics—Karl Binding, a widely
published legal scholar, and Alfred Hoche, a professor of psychiatry with a
specialty in neuropathology—published Die Freigabe der Vernichtung
lebensunwerten Lebens (Authorization for the Destruction of Life Unworthy of
Life). In it they argued that German law should permit the mercy killing of
institutionalized patients who were lebensunwert ("unworthy of life") because
their lives were "without purpose" and a burden to their relatives and society.
Beginning in the 1920s, the Rockefeller Foundation and other American
foundations provided extensive financial support for eugenics research in
Germany. By the time the Nazis came to power, more than twenty institutes for
"racial hygiene" had already been established at German universities. The Law on Preventing Hereditarily Ill Progeny, which the Nazi government issued
on July 14, 1933, required the sterilization of patients suffering from mental
and physical disorders in state hospitals and nursing homes. By then, the United
States had already sterilized more than fifteen thousand people, most of them
while they were incarcerated in prisons or homes for the mentally ill. America's
sterilization laws made such a favorable impression on Hitler that he looked to
the United States for racial leadership. "I have studied with great interest the
laws of several American states concerning prevention of reproduction by people
whose progeny would, in all probability, be of no value or be injurious to the
racial stock." Nazi Germany's sterilization efforts quickly surpassed those of
the United States, reaching between 300,000 to 400,000 people. Germany's eugenics campaign entered a new, deadly phase in 1939 when Hitler
issued a secret order for the systematic murder of mentally retarded,
emotionally disturbed, and physically infirm Germans who were an embarrassment
to the myth of Aryan supremacy. Once "defective" children were identified and institutionalized, doctors and
nurses either starved them to death, or gave them lethal doses of luminal (a
sedative), veronal (sleeping pills), morphine, or scopolamine. The "euthanasia"
program—named Operation T4, or simply T4—transported adults to special killing
centers outfitted with gas chambers. T4 killed between seventy and ninety
thousand Germans before it was officially stopped in August 1941. In 1942, not
long after German psychiatrists had sent the last of their patients to the gas
chambers, the Journal of the American Psychiatric Association published an
article that called for the killing of retarded children ("nature's mistakes"). Like the American Charles Davenport, Heinrich Himmler, head of the Nazi S.S. and
a main architect of the Final Solution, began his Eugenics education with animal
breeding. His agricultural studies and experience breeding chickens convinced
him that since all behavioral characteristics are hereditary, the most effective
way to shape the future of a population—human or otherwise—was to institute
breeding projects that favored the desirable and eliminated the undesirable. Rudolf Höss, the commandant of Auschwitz who also had a farming background,
wrote in his autobiography after the war that the original plan for Auschwitz
had been to make it into a major agricultural research station. "All kinds of
stockbreeding was to be pursued there." However, in the summer of 1941 Himmler
summoned him to Berlin to inform him of the fateful order for the mass
extermination of the Jews of Europe, an order that soon turned Auschwitz into
"the largest human slaughterhouse that history had ever known." By the summer of
1942, Auschwitz was a vast, full-service Eugenics center for the improvement of
animal and human populations, complete with stockbreeding centers and the
Birkenau extermination camp for the culling of Jews, Gypsies, and other
"sub-humans." The breeding and killing of animals that was the centerpiece of American and
German eugenics produced a number of key T4 personnel, including those sent to
Poland to operate the death camps. Victor Brack, T4's chief manager, received a
diploma in agriculture from the Technical University in Munich, while Hans
Hefelmann, who headed the office that coordinated the killing of handicapped
children, had a doctorate in agricultural economics. Before spending more than
two years at the Hartheim euthanasia center in Austria, Bruno Bruckner had
worked as a porter in a Linz slaughterhouse. Willi Mentz, an especially sadistic
guard at Treblinka, had been in charge of cows and pigs at two T4 killing
centers, Grafeneck and Hadamar. Treblinka's last commandant, Kurt Franz, trained
with a master butcher before joining the S.S. Karl Frenzel, who worked as a
stoker at Hadamar before being posted to the Sobibor death camp, had also been a
butcher. For German personnel sent to Poland to exterminate Jews, experience in
the exploitation and slaughter of animals proved to be excellent training. The German Jewish philosopher Theodor Adorno once said: "Auschwitz begins
whenever someone looks at a slaughterhouse and thinks: they're only animals."
The exploitation and slaughter of animals instills in us the habit of
withholding our compassion from those we define as Other and hardens our hearts
to their suffering and death. Our detachment and indifference toward their fate
makes us more inclined to commit atrocities against each other. What we do to
animals, we sooner or later do to members of our own species. As the Yiddish
writer Isaac Bashevis Singer observed, "There is only one little step from
killing animals to creating gas chambers a la Hitler." We need to eradicate the notion that there exist in the world groups of sentient
beings not entitled to our empathy and protection. Extending the circle of our
compassion to include all living beings will make the world a safer and more
humane place. It's the only thing that will. |
||||||
|
||||||
Charles Patterson, Ph.D., is the author of Eternal Treblinka: Our Treatment of Animals and the Holocaust http://www.eternaltreblinka.com/ |
||||||
|
||||||