| Issue: 2.01 | January 1, 2001 |   by: 
        Marlene Adler Marks 
       | 
  ||||
![]()  | 
      The Clinton Years   Nostalgia for Bill Clinton? Even before George W. Bush officially takes 
office, the Jewish community is weeping sentimental tears for the almost 
lethally charismatic president who in the words of the Forward newspaper, "had 
come to embody the hopes of Jewish liberals in America and Israel during the 
1990s." Clinton, who is no stranger to schmaltz, had policy wonks and foreign 
affairs careerists alike publicly weeping when he chose the Israel Policy 
Institute as the site of his last address last week, hinting that yet one more 
attempt at an Arab-Israeli solution was still in the works. It will take time to assess the Clinton years, to understand how the Man from 
Hope changed the Jewish world. But here's a first cast at what might stay in the 
heart and mind long after Clinton is gone. *Israel. Starting from ground zero, Bill Clinton's growing love for Israel 
was a thing to behold. The assassination of Yitzhak Rabin was, for him, like a 
death in the family. Observers said it was like Clinton had lost his own father. 
Like much of the American Jewish community, a grieving Clinton went to bat for 
Shimon Peres, an uncharacteristic loss of political objectivity with disastrous 
consequences when Peres lost to Benjamin Netanyahu. The Clinton years have changed the face of Israel, as the Oslo accords 
brought an end to the Arab boycott. I personally witnessed the remarkable 
turnaround in Israel's economic relationships as trade began with such stalwart 
pro-Arab nations as Japan and India. I'll never forget a Tokyo trade minister's 
glow as he praised the special qualities of oranges imported from Haifa. An 
economic miracle that even the prophets would enjoy has occurred; Israel has 
become a normal citizen of the world. *Madeleine Albright. Clinton may not have knowingly named a child of 
Holocaust survivors as Secretary of State, but the appointment of Madeleine 
Albright has been an extraordinary turning point for world Jewry, a real-life 
corollary to the cathartic release of the film "Schindler's List." Through 
Albright, Jews have been able to look into their own family secrets, to 
acknowledge the ghosts, defeats and self-deceptions that still weigh so heavily 
on us about the Shoah. As we look ahead to the Bush II, with an administration apparently to be 
dominated by oil interests, the valor of the Albright years, with its 
high-minded if imperfect commitment to fighting tyranny abroad, will become more 
sharply lit. Historians, in fact, may see Madeleine Albright's years as a book 
end to the career of Henry Kissinger, the first Jewish secretary of state whose 
own talented demons, influenced by German experience, powerfully shaped American 
foreign policy. *The Jewish/urban connection. In a miracle of personal transformation, Bill 
Clinton, the former governor from Arkansas, has strangely connected to the 
nation's sophisticates and elites, of which the American Jewish community is one 
key part. Robert E. Rubin and Alan Greenspan will get the credit for steering 
the U.S. economy through its greatest period of economic prosperity. Clinton was 
their boss. Right from the start, Jews voted for Clinton in big numbers, and counted 
largely among those who stayed in the Lincoln bedroom. The Clinton-Barbra 
Streisand magnetism will, in memory, symbolize the high-charged bravado that 
both the President and the Jewish community have at times experienced over the 
past 8 years. We have never felt as comfortable in our own skin, and may never 
again. The political terrain changed dramatically, even within the Jewish world, 
thanks in good measure to Clinton. Neo-Conservativism, that movement to revive 
the Republican party led by Jewish intellectuals like William Kristol during 
Bush I, lost steam, thanks to Clinton's success in moving the Democrats to the 
middle. In the Weekly Standard last week, conservative writers attempted to 
prove that the nomination of John Ashcroft as Attorney General was not the 
Paleolithic step backwards that liberals claim. But whether Bush II repeats 
Reagan or Eisenhower, it seems committed to burning the bridge to the 21st 
Century. Of course Clinton was a phenomenal personal disappointment. Notorious lies 
and cover-ups sacrificed his policies if not only his reputation. What began as 
a man who didn't inhale ended with a man who didn't trust. He didn't trust 
Americans to have grown up with him, to understand how the Vietnam war and the 
sexual revolution confused us all. His early waffling on gays in the military, 
the failure to defend or comprehend the issues facing contemporary women 
starting with political appointments of Zoë Baird and Lani Guinier were later to 
deteriorate into his extraordinary bad judgment with Monica Lewinsky. It's hard 
not to shake the head at the shameful waste. Yet Clinton's intellectual sophistication was a wonder. Those coffees with 
the President may have turned into a political nightmare during the second 
Clinton Administration, but having been at one I will always remember his love 
of ideas, and an antenna for what matters to people. Even as Bush II begins, we 
feel the difference.  | 
  |||||
|  
       | 
    ||||||
© 2001 Marlene Adler Marks. You can contact Marlene directly at wmnsvoice@aol.com  | 
  ||||||
|  
        | 
  ||||||