Issue: 2.01 | January 1, 2001 | by:
Marlene Adler Marks
|
||||
The Clinton Years Nostalgia for Bill Clinton? Even before George W. Bush officially takes
office, the Jewish community is weeping sentimental tears for the almost
lethally charismatic president who in the words of the Forward newspaper, "had
come to embody the hopes of Jewish liberals in America and Israel during the
1990s." Clinton, who is no stranger to schmaltz, had policy wonks and foreign
affairs careerists alike publicly weeping when he chose the Israel Policy
Institute as the site of his last address last week, hinting that yet one more
attempt at an Arab-Israeli solution was still in the works. It will take time to assess the Clinton years, to understand how the Man from
Hope changed the Jewish world. But here's a first cast at what might stay in the
heart and mind long after Clinton is gone. *Israel. Starting from ground zero, Bill Clinton's growing love for Israel
was a thing to behold. The assassination of Yitzhak Rabin was, for him, like a
death in the family. Observers said it was like Clinton had lost his own father.
Like much of the American Jewish community, a grieving Clinton went to bat for
Shimon Peres, an uncharacteristic loss of political objectivity with disastrous
consequences when Peres lost to Benjamin Netanyahu. The Clinton years have changed the face of Israel, as the Oslo accords
brought an end to the Arab boycott. I personally witnessed the remarkable
turnaround in Israel's economic relationships as trade began with such stalwart
pro-Arab nations as Japan and India. I'll never forget a Tokyo trade minister's
glow as he praised the special qualities of oranges imported from Haifa. An
economic miracle that even the prophets would enjoy has occurred; Israel has
become a normal citizen of the world. *Madeleine Albright. Clinton may not have knowingly named a child of
Holocaust survivors as Secretary of State, but the appointment of Madeleine
Albright has been an extraordinary turning point for world Jewry, a real-life
corollary to the cathartic release of the film "Schindler's List." Through
Albright, Jews have been able to look into their own family secrets, to
acknowledge the ghosts, defeats and self-deceptions that still weigh so heavily
on us about the Shoah. As we look ahead to the Bush II, with an administration apparently to be
dominated by oil interests, the valor of the Albright years, with its
high-minded if imperfect commitment to fighting tyranny abroad, will become more
sharply lit. Historians, in fact, may see Madeleine Albright's years as a book
end to the career of Henry Kissinger, the first Jewish secretary of state whose
own talented demons, influenced by German experience, powerfully shaped American
foreign policy. *The Jewish/urban connection. In a miracle of personal transformation, Bill
Clinton, the former governor from Arkansas, has strangely connected to the
nation's sophisticates and elites, of which the American Jewish community is one
key part. Robert E. Rubin and Alan Greenspan will get the credit for steering
the U.S. economy through its greatest period of economic prosperity. Clinton was
their boss. Right from the start, Jews voted for Clinton in big numbers, and counted
largely among those who stayed in the Lincoln bedroom. The Clinton-Barbra
Streisand magnetism will, in memory, symbolize the high-charged bravado that
both the President and the Jewish community have at times experienced over the
past 8 years. We have never felt as comfortable in our own skin, and may never
again. The political terrain changed dramatically, even within the Jewish world,
thanks in good measure to Clinton. Neo-Conservativism, that movement to revive
the Republican party led by Jewish intellectuals like William Kristol during
Bush I, lost steam, thanks to Clinton's success in moving the Democrats to the
middle. In the Weekly Standard last week, conservative writers attempted to
prove that the nomination of John Ashcroft as Attorney General was not the
Paleolithic step backwards that liberals claim. But whether Bush II repeats
Reagan or Eisenhower, it seems committed to burning the bridge to the 21st
Century. Of course Clinton was a phenomenal personal disappointment. Notorious lies
and cover-ups sacrificed his policies if not only his reputation. What began as
a man who didn't inhale ended with a man who didn't trust. He didn't trust
Americans to have grown up with him, to understand how the Vietnam war and the
sexual revolution confused us all. His early waffling on gays in the military,
the failure to defend or comprehend the issues facing contemporary women
starting with political appointments of Zoë Baird and Lani Guinier were later to
deteriorate into his extraordinary bad judgment with Monica Lewinsky. It's hard
not to shake the head at the shameful waste. Yet Clinton's intellectual sophistication was a wonder. Those coffees with
the President may have turned into a political nightmare during the second
Clinton Administration, but having been at one I will always remember his love
of ideas, and an antenna for what matters to people. Even as Bush II begins, we
feel the difference. |
||||||
|
||||||
© 2001 Marlene Adler Marks. You can contact Marlene directly at wmnsvoice@aol.com |
||||||
|
||||||