Return to homepage

Bookmark This Site
 
Search our site
SPECIAL FEATUREMarch 13, 2011
 
Send this page to a friendIncrease Font
Page DownBottom

FacebookRedditDeliciousDigg
Share this page
 
What, One Wonders, Is The Motto Of The Nogodniks?
by: Joe Klock, Sr.
 
Issue:
12.03
 
Important dates

This Month...

Editor's Comment
Michael looks at:
Farewell, Shalom and Adieu


Eddy's Recipe List
Victoria Sponge

Book Review
Unstrung Heroes

The Outspeaker
Encouraging violence is never correct

Batya
Good times and bad times with Batya

Nathan Weissler
What my friendship with Michael Hanna-Fein meant to me


Marjorie Wolfe
An Interview with Paul Reiser

BC's Backlot
The Last Shalom

This And That
My Treasure Chest

Three Symbols of Passover

Stress

Lynn Ruth Miller
How we all became part of a bigger story

Mel Yahre
A few words for my friend

Eddy's Thoughts
Don't let life flutter by

The Bear Facts
How I found Michael


 

Nearly two hundred years ago, Francis Scott Key penned the lyrics of The Star-Spangled Banner, which was adopted as our National Anthem in 1931.

Although the first stanza is well-known to most Americans - and routinely butchered by celebrity presenters at sporting events - you can pick up easy money at almost any gathering of American citizenry by betting that nobody there can recite the later quatrain that goes like this:

"Then conquer we must, when our cause it is just,
And this be our motto: 'In God is our trust.'
And the star-spangled banner in triumph shall wave,
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave!"

Over recent years, the militant Nogodniks among us have succeeded in banning audible prayer at public assemblies in this "heaven-rescued land" (phrase also excerpted from the same anthem). I'm not aware whether the words quoted above have ever been challenged by the ACLUneys and their ilkmates in thought, but I'm sure they're dead set agin it.

Admittedly imbedded in our Constitution is a prohibition against the establishment of an official national religion, a so-called "wall of separation" between church (not God, mind you) and state.

This has been so torturously misinterpreted that God has become a no-no word and a purported threat to the freedoms envisioned by our forefathers - as well as, presumably, our foremothers.

Never mind, for purposes of this discussion, that the framers of our Constitution were immersed in Theism no less thoroughly than were the earliest Christians dunked in the Jordan.

Clearly they, the people who authored our guiding documents, wanted to avoid force-feeding a state religion - like the Anglican Church in Olde England - on the citizens of this brave new world.

Neither did they deny - nor, in fact, fail to proclaim repeatedly- that there was a higher power (also mentioned as such elsewhere in Key's 1814 opus).

Those who now choose to deny the existence of God are sure as hell free to do so, and equally free to exercise their unbelief without restriction, but so should be the members of God's various squads - equal protection under the law for believers and non-believers alike

It's hard for me to imagine how the deniers can whomp up a whole lot of excitement in the naysaying process, but that's none of my business, nor is it any skin off the "knows" of charismatic religionists.

It's equally difficult to discern why they get their skivvies and panties in a bunch over a deity which they so vehemently maintain is non-existent and, consequently, no more a threat to them than the Loch Ness monster and the bogey men of their childhood nightmares.

I would think it much scarier to think that there is not a higher power, call it what you will, than the poseurs, popinjays and poopheads who "run things" in America, ranging from the District of Calumny to our puniest precincts of power.

At a minimum, it is comforting to believe, or maybe just hope, that there is a world-to-come in which, as Dorothy sang on the road to Oz, "troubles melt like lemon drops," where everybody gets along, where nobody lies or cries, where no locks are needed, where nothing hurts or itches, and where the Boy Scout Oath is the order of the days that have no nights.

What harm is there in dreaming of such a destination, or in trusting in a benevolent figure who presides there? And what fun is there in denying such beliefs and/or depriving others of the comfort it gives them?

Hey, if it turns out that there is no God, what harm is/was there in believing or hoping otherwise?

If the Atheists are right, the believers will still have enjoyed the joys and blessings of anticipation, of which the A-team will have deliberately deprived itself - somewhat like sprinkling ice cream cones with red pepper.

And, in any event, what's the fun of or satisfaction in raining on the parade of the hopeful or faithful flocks? Isn't it sorta-kinda like telling kids that there ain't no Santa Claus?

And what, by the way, do you committed Atheists say to each other when one of you sneezes? (Just kidding.)

So, lighten up, Nogodniks; the G-man (if, perchance, He does exist), loves you, too - believe it or not!

And His promise of a life after death not only beats the alternative, but makes life BEFORE death a lot more tolerable.




Freelance wordworker Joe Klock, Sr. "The Goy Wonder" (joeklock@aol.com) winters in Key Largo and Coral Gables, Florida and summers in New Hampshire. More of his "Klockwork" can be found at www.joeklock.com.

 
  See all the Features      
   
Advertisement

Page UpTop Small Monitor Subscribe Tzedakeh Links

Subscribe (free) to the Gantseh Megillah. The Gantseh Megillah and GantsehMegillah.com are designed and hosted by HannaVisioN About this site Send a financial contribution to this site Contact us See our glossary of Yiddish words and expressions Log In Join
Personal insights from two yiddishe meydls Life stories from the heart News and information with a lighter touch Politics and policy with a Yiddishe taam